Skip to content

Newsroom

What changed, and what it means for the clause on your desk

Analysis of the decisions, provider rules, and scholarship shaping mass arbitration practice. Every piece links to the primary and secondary sources it draws on.

An abstracted broadsheet spread with one column set in navy as the lead story
Branded card: the headline beside a hazard-triangle icon
Mass Torts & PIOct 6, 2026

Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator MDLs Created: Chicago for Abbott, Oakland for Nevro

On October 2, 2026 the JPML created separate Abbott and Nevro spinal cord stimulator MDLs, sending Abbott cases to Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins in Illinois and Nevro cases to Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. in California, and refusing to pair either with Boston Scientific's docket.

Torts Desk··19 min read

The short version

  • On October 2, 2026 the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued two separate transfer orders: Abbott spinal cord stimulator cases (MDL No. 3194) go to Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins in the Northern District of Illinois, and Nevro cases (MDL No. 3195) go to Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. in the Northern District of California.
  • Both petitions had asked for the Central District of California, where Judge Josephine L. Staton has run the Boston Scientific docket, MDL No. 3181, since June 5, 2026; the Panel sent neither there, so the three largest spinal cord stimulator manufacturers now face three judges in three courts.
  • Bloomberg Law reported that Abbott faces 26 pending federal suits in 13 districts and Nevro 23 claims in 10 districts; the Abbott motion as filed in June listed 15 actions in seven districts and the Nevro motion 17 actions in six.
Clause DraftingAug 26, 2026

Amazon Comes Back to Arbitration — and Brings a Funder Disclosure Clause With It

Five years after abandoning consumer arbitration under the weight of 75,000 Alexa demands, Amazon reinstated it on 14 August 2026. The new clause is the most complete defence-side answer to mass arbitration yet drafted: a 60-day condition precedent, escalating JAMS batching, appeal rights on every batch, and a first-of-its-kind obligation to hand over litigation funding agreements.

Clause Desk · 4 min

InternationalMay 5, 2026

Why Mass Arbitration Stays Home

The institutional frameworks do not exist, consumer disputes are non-arbitrable across much of Europe, and investor-state filing fees make the model economically impossible. Mass arbitration looks likely to remain an American phenomenon.

Research Desk · 3 min

Fees & EconomicsApr 8, 2026

Milberg Opens a Privacy Inventory Against Yahoo Over ConnectID

The claim is that an email address became a permanent tracking identifier that survived cookie deletion. The procedural point is that the campaign was launched as a mass arbitration from the outset, with claimant recruitment running through a partner intake platform rather than a class definition.

Economics Desk · 3 min

Fees & EconomicsApr 7, 2026

The Fee Curve, Before and After January 2024

Case management fees, not filing fees, were what made mass arbitration devastating. The AAA eliminated them. Here is what the numbers look like on either side of that change — and where the cost has migrated to.

Rules Desk · 3 min

Fees & EconomicsJan 27, 2026

The Premise That Turned Out to Be Contingent

Litigation theory held that claims worth less than the cost of bringing them cannot be litigated without a procedural aggregation device. Mass arbitration showed that premise depended on institutional design — and everything since has been an attempt to restore it.

Research Desk · 4 min

  • Provider rule changes and fee-schedule moves, as they land
  • Every unconscionability ruling that changes how you draft
  • No promotions, no filler — one email, one click to unsubscribe

We use your details only to send the briefing and to verify you work in the field. No sharing, no selling. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy.