Skip to content
Mass Tort & MDL

Design Defect

A claim that the product's design itself was unreasonably dangerous.

Assessed under a risk-utility test, a consumer expectations test, or both depending on the jurisdiction, usually requiring proof of a reasonable alternative design. Design claims survive some preemption arguments that defeat warning claims, which shapes pleading strategy across an inventory.

See also

Published for legal professionals. Analysis and summaries only — not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by use of this site.

  • Provider rule changes and fee-schedule moves, as they land
  • Every unconscionability ruling that changes how you draft
  • No promotions, no filler — one email, one click to unsubscribe

We use your details only to send the briefing and to verify you work in the field. No sharing, no selling. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy.