Skip to content
Mass Arbitration

Claim Suppression

The net effect of procedural requirements that deter, delay, or defeat claims regardless of merit.

A term of art in the scholarly literature on arbitration redrafting. Suppression need not be intentional in any individual clause; it is the aggregate consequence of stacking notice requirements, evidentiary preconditions, batching queues, and fee allocations such that a meaningful share of meritorious claims is never adjudicated. Whether procedural elaboration of this kind takes an agreement outside what the Federal Arbitration Act protects — and therefore outside preemption — is an active question.

See also

Published for legal professionals. Analysis and summaries only — not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by use of this site.

  • Provider rule changes and fee-schedule moves, as they land
  • Every unconscionability ruling that changes how you draft
  • No promotions, no filler — one email, one click to unsubscribe

We use your details only to send the briefing and to verify you work in the field. No sharing, no selling. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy.